Harold Chen had spent thirty-one years writing embedded software at Texas Instruments' Plano campus before he retired in 2021. He and his wife Dorothy, 69, owned a comfortable four-bedroom home in the Willow Bend area of Plano, fully paid off. Their children were grown. Their financial planner had told them they were in good shape: Social Security, a modest pension from Harold's early years at a Dallas semiconductor firm, and a traditional IRA worth $410,000 — the result of maxing contributions for three decades and leaving the account alone to compound.
Harold was 72. He would turn 73 the following April, the age at which the SECURE 2.0 Act requires traditional IRA owners to begin taking required minimum distributions. His financial planner had told him to wait until the last possible moment before starting withdrawals — "Let it keep growing," she had said. So Harold had never taken a dollar out of the IRA.
In February 2026, Harold fell on ice in his driveway and fractured his hip. The surgery went well, but the recovery did not. A pulmonary embolism during the rehabilitation stay set off a cascade of complications that left him, eight weeks after the fall, unable to walk independently or manage daily activities without skilled assistance. His neurologist told Dorothy that Harold's recovery plateau had been reached, and that the level of care he needed was beyond what home health aides could safely provide.
Dorothy toured three skilled nursing facilities in Collin County. The one she chose cost $9,200 a month.
She remembered hearing about Medicaid covering nursing home care and called a senior helpline for guidance. Within an hour, a navigator was walking her through the HHSC application. The navigator asked about their assets. Dorothy listed them: the house, a joint savings account with about $38,000, Harold's IRA at $410,000, and her own smaller IRA worth $94,000.
"I'd need to explain the rules about IRAs," the navigator said.
What she explained stopped Dorothy cold.
The Assumption Almost Everyone Gets Wrong
When people think about retirement accounts, they think about them the way their financial advisors taught them to think: as long-term savings, tax-advantaged, designated for retirement. The word "retirement" is right there in the name. Surely Medicaid — a program designed to cover care for people who have run out of resources — would recognize that an IRA is different from a bank account. Surely it would leave retirement savings alone.
Texas Medicaid does not see it that way. And it does not have to, because "IRA" is a tax concept, not a Medicaid concept. The question Medicaid asks is not what kind of account it is. The question is whether you can convert it to cash. If you can, it is a resource. If it is a resource, it counts toward the $2,000 limit that a Medicaid applicant is permitted to retain.
A traditional IRA — at least in the situation Harold was in — is fully accessible. The owner can liquidate it any time, paying income taxes and possibly an early-withdrawal penalty. The fact that Harold hadn't touched it was irrelevant. The fact that he could was everything.
So Harold's $410,000 IRA was, under Texas Medicaid rules, a countable resource. Before Medicaid would pay for his nursing home care, that account — along with the joint savings account — would need to be spent down to the applicable resource limits. The house, as the primary residence of the community spouse, was exempt. Dorothy's own IRA had its own set of rules. But Harold's $410,000 was squarely on the table.
The Payout-Status Exception — and Why Timing Is Everything
Here is the part the navigator explained next, and the part that most families in Harold's situation never learn until it is too late.
Texas Medicaid follows the Social Security Administration's supplemental security income (SSI) resource rules for retirement accounts, as set forth in POMS SI 01120.200 and implemented through the Texas HHSC Income and Resources Handbook. Under those rules, a retirement account is treated very differently depending on whether it is in what the regulations call "payout status."
An IRA is in payout status when the owner is receiving — or is required to receive — regular periodic distributions from the account. The clearest example is an account from which the owner is taking required minimum distributions. Another example is an IRA that has been annuitized, meaning converted into a stream of payments through an arrangement with an insurance company.
When an IRA is in payout status, it is treated as exempt for Medicaid resource purposes. The account balance does not count toward the $2,000 limit. Instead, the distributions flowing out of the account each month count as income.
When an IRA is not in payout status — when, like Harold's, it has been sitting untouched — it is treated as a countable resource, fully included in the resource calculation.
Harold had been nine weeks away from his 73rd birthday, the age at which RMDs would have become mandatory. Nine weeks before that date, he fell on ice in his driveway. If he had started taking RMDs even one month earlier — if his financial planner had said "April is close enough, let's start your distributions in January" — Harold's $410,000 IRA would have been in payout status on the day Dorothy called HHSC. It would have been exempt. The only thing that would have counted toward the Medicaid resource limit was the $38,000 in the joint savings account, which the community spouse resource allowance (CSRA) would have protected almost entirely.
The difference between "January" and "February" — the difference between taking one distribution and taking none — was the difference between Harold qualifying for Medicaid almost immediately and Harold facing years of spending down a $410,000 account at $9,200 a month.
What the Community Spouse's IRA Is Worth Knowing
Dorothy's own IRA — the $94,000 account she had built over her years working in healthcare administration — was a separate question. Under the federal spousal impoverishment protections in 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-5, the community spouse's resources are treated differently from the institutionalized spouse's resources.
Texas HHSC excludes the community spouse's IRAs and retirement accounts from the resource calculation entirely. Dorothy's $94,000 IRA was not counted against the CSRA limit, was not considered part of the couple's countable assets, and would not affect Harold's Medicaid eligibility at all. It was hers to keep, untouched, regardless of what happened with Harold's account.
This distinction — applicant's IRA vs. community spouse's IRA — is one of the most important facts in Medicaid planning for married couples, and one of the least understood. Many families hearing "your IRA counts against Medicaid" assume the rule applies to both spouses. For the community spouse, it does not.
What Happens When the IRA Goes Into Payout Status Mid-Planning
Questions about elder law? A WG Law attorney can walk you through your options.
Families who learn the payout-status rule after a nursing home admission often ask whether they can fix the problem retroactively — whether starting distributions now can convert the IRA from a countable resource to an exempt one.
The answer is yes, but with an important caveat: the timing of the conversion matters, and any distributions taken before the account is in official payout status are still income received before the Medicaid eligibility date. The strategy is not to pretend the account was always in payout status; it is to structure the account so that it qualifies going forward while addressing the prior-distribution history accurately on the application.
There is also an income dimension. When an IRA moves into payout status and its distributions begin flowing as income, those distributions add to the Medicaid applicant's total monthly income. Texas Medicaid uses an income cap: in 2026, the cap is $2,982 per month. If Harold's Social Security, pension, and IRA distributions combined push his income above $2,982, he would need a Qualified Income Trust (Miller Trust) to remain eligible — a separate trust account through which excess income flows before being directed to the nursing facility. The existence of a Miller Trust does not block Medicaid; it channels the income correctly so eligibility is preserved. But it is an additional planning layer that families need to anticipate.
The interaction between IRA distributions, income caps, and Miller Trusts is exactly the kind of cascading complexity that makes Medicaid planning treacherous without professional guidance. Each decision affects another, and small errors — or decisions made in the wrong order — can trigger ineligibility periods or incorrect application denials that take months to correct.
The Roth IRA Problem
Harold's IRA was a traditional IRA, subject to required minimum distributions starting at age 73. Traditional IRA owners have a clear path to payout status: reach RMD age and start taking the required distributions.
Owners of Roth IRAs face a different situation. Under current federal tax law, Roth IRAs do not have required minimum distributions during the owner's lifetime. The entire appeal of a Roth — tax-free growth forever, no forced distributions — also means that a Roth IRA cannot reach "payout status" through RMDs the way a traditional IRA can.
If Harold had converted his traditional IRA to a Roth at some point during his working years, that $410,000 would still be sitting untouched — and still countable under Medicaid rules. Payout status requires actual periodic distributions, not just theoretical accessibility. A Roth IRA that the owner never touches has no payout-status argument available to it.
The solution for Roth IRA owners considering long-term care planning is not RMDs but annuitization — converting the account into a stream of fixed payments through an insurance annuity arrangement. A properly structured Medicaid-compliant annuity can put a Roth IRA into an equivalent of payout status. The rules are strict and the options are limited, but the path exists.
This is a nuanced area where the correct answer depends entirely on the specific account, the owner's age, the state of their health, the community spouse's financial situation, and the availability of compliant annuity products at the time of planning. It is not a decision that should be made based on general information.
What Pre-Crisis Planning Looks Like
Harold's story is a crisis scenario — a fall that happened before the planning conversation could happen. Most Texas families can avoid Harold's outcome, but only by having the conversation early enough to act.
For a traditional IRA owner approaching age 73, the Medicaid planning conversation should happen before RMDs begin — not because starting RMDs is the only option, but because the timing of that decision has significant consequences if long-term care becomes necessary. Voluntarily beginning distributions before the mandatory date can establish payout status earlier, preserving flexibility if health deteriorates.
For Roth IRA owners, the question is different: because Roth IRAs are countable resources under Medicaid (absent annuitization), families with substantial Roth balances and long-term care risk may want to evaluate whether a different asset structure serves their goals better — or whether partial annuitization makes sense as part of a broader plan.
For married couples, the division between the applicant's accounts and the community spouse's accounts is among the first things an elder law attorney analyzes, because the treatment is dramatically different and can affect the overall planning strategy significantly.
And for families already in a crisis — a spouse in a nursing home, an IRA that is countable, and a Medicaid application pending — the question is what options remain. Annuitization, structured spend-down on exempt assets, Medicaid-compliant strategies under the five-year look-back rules, and proper application sequencing can still make a significant difference even at that stage. But time matters, and decisions made in the wrong order can close off options that would otherwise be available.
The Outcome Dorothy Didn't Expect
Harold was still alive, still in the Collin County skilled nursing facility, when Dorothy sat across from a WG Law elder law attorney three weeks after the HHSC call. She brought Harold's IRA statement, his Social Security award letter, the pension documentation, and a copy of the lease on the facility.
The attorney explained what the navigator had told her and what she hadn't: that Harold's IRA was countable, but that there were still options available — a structured spend-down plan using the countable assets to pay for care while protecting the house and Dorothy's IRA, a Medicaid-compliant annuity that could accelerate Harold's eligibility timeline, and a careful sequencing of the application to maximize the CSRA under the 2026 figures. The house remained safe. Dorothy's account remained safe. The question was how to get Harold to Medicaid eligibility as quickly as possible using the tools the law provided.
It was not the same outcome Harold would have had if he had started RMDs in January. But it was a substantially better outcome than simply spending $9,200 a month until the $410,000 was gone — which is what Dorothy had been prepared to do before she made the call.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Texas Medicaid rules are complex, subject to change, and highly fact-specific; HHSC policies and federal regulations governing retirement accounts in Medicaid planning require individualized analysis. Consult a licensed Texas elder law attorney before making any decisions about retirement accounts, Medicaid applications, or long-term care planning.
Call 214-250-4407 or request a consultation with WG Law's elder law team. Taylor Willingham has guided more than 10,000 Texas families through estate planning and elder law challenges, including Medicaid planning for married couples navigating the payout-status rules described above. For further reading, see our guides on Medicaid crisis planning when a parent needs a nursing home now, how the Texas Medicaid five-year look-back period works, community spouse resource allowance and spousal impoverishment protections, Qualified Income Trusts (Miller Trusts) when income exceeds the Medicaid cap, and the Texas Medicaid planning cost guide for the 2026 penalty divisor, CSRA, and income cap figures. WG Law serves McKinney, Plano, Frisco, Allen, Southlake, and the greater DFW metroplex from offices in McKinney and Southlake. Learn more about the WG Law elder law practice.